Citizendium Forums
November 23, 2009, 03:53:35 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: POSTING RULES FOR MAIN CZ BOARDS: (1) The CZ Forums are Citizens-only (a "Citizen" is a Citizendium member). Non-Citizens may use only the "Non-member discussion" and "General help" boards, but still must register before posting (it's easy!). Non-Citizen posts elsewhere will be summarily deleted. (2) All must now use their own real names. To edit your displayed name, click on Profile > Account Related Settings. (3) Citizens must now link to their CZ user pages. To edit your signature, click on Profile > Forum Profile Information.
Click here to return to the wiki
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pointing out errors  (Read 7498 times)
Tintin
New Arrival
*
Posts: 3


« on: April 16, 2007, 11:18:48 PM »


I am not interested in joining CZ because I don't want to reveal my real identity.

If I want to point out an error in an article, what is the proper way for doing it (assuming, of course, that you accept corrections from anons) ? Post it here ?
Logged
Stephen Ewen
Guest
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2007, 11:29:06 PM »


I am not interested in joining CZ because I don't want to reveal my real identity.

If I want to point out an error in an article, what is the proper way for doing it (assuming, of course, that you accept corrections from anons) ? Post it here ?

Hi there. Thanks for visiting!

Is this an approved article you are talking about or one not approved?
Logged
Tintin
New Arrival
*
Posts: 3


« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2007, 11:39:13 PM »

This is in a non-approved article.
Logged
Larry Sanger
Administrator
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 1755



WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2007, 09:59:23 AM »

For now, you can post your critique here on the Forums.  We don't yet have any way to let non-members edit the wiki itself.
Logged

My CZ user page: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Larry_Sanger
Please link to your CZ user page in your signature, too!
To do that, click on Profile > Forum Profile Information.
Matt Innis
Administrator
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 844


« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2007, 09:53:42 PM »

This needs to be moved up on the "to do"  list.  As we get more 'viewers' we are likely to get more input from potential authors and editors.  The forums seem to be too intimidating for those using citizendium for research and notice an error.  If we can decide what we want to do, I will do my best  follow up with it.
Logged

Robert_W_King
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 607


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2007, 12:15:44 AM »

Is it possible to create some kind of submission form and a pseudo "inbox" for articles that all registered users can view?
Logged

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Robert_W_King

All current posts beyond May 8th are typed in short form (mistakes) or with my good hand (sans mistakes).
Stephen Ewen
Guest
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2007, 12:47:48 AM »

Is it possible to create some kind of submission form and a pseudo "inbox" for articles that all registered users can view?

The code to allow something close to that in MediaWiki exists, is available just for the asking, and could be adapted for CZ.  You can see it at work at WikiHow--the folks there developed it.   Go to any article, say, http://www.wikihow.com/Fish-for-River-Trout, and scroll down to the bottom.  You will see a link "Thank the Authors".  This goes to a page where one writes a message that then goes to each of the main contributors of the article (that's another thing that could be added--you can view that at the bottom of the page there as well).  The messages then aggregate at a special page, called "Kudos", for each author. The code that names the authors and allows reader feedback are dependent.

I am not sure we should implement it--maybe we should, maybe we should not--but the ability to do it is there.  One issue is that we'd really not want to receive anon IP feedback (which is what all of it would be) on anything but approved articles, so that would mean writing code or, perhaps, placing all non-approved articles on a draft subpage.  One good thing--and this is a major thing that would incline me to support it now, where I formerly argued strenuously against it--is that none of the comments would need to be moderated (meaning this would give constables no new tasks), since they are only viewable to the specific authors of the article.  Someone could cuss the authors out and the outcome would be no greater than receiving a spam message in one's email inbox. 

Again, however, naming principle contributors to an article through the mechanism mentioned above, and this anon IP feedback system to them, are dependent.  We'd have to decide on the former before the latter, or come up with something other than adapting this code from Wikihow to allow the feedback.  I very much think CZ should adopt the author attribution system, for reasons I've spelled out elsewhere.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2007, 01:20:21 AM by Stephen Ewen » Logged
Paul Wormer
Forum Communicator
***
Posts: 281


« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2007, 06:21:05 AM »

I am much in favor of an easy system by which a general reader can report errors. As a reader of WP articles I corrected many small errors (typos, dates, etc.). As a WP author, I received much useful feedback, sometimes from people that made one contribution only, namely a correction in an article of mine. Even aggressive comments or stupid edits made me realize sometimes that one or more of my sentences were obscure and open to improvement. All in all, in my opinion, feedback from readers can improve the CZ work.
Logged

Tintin
New Arrival
*
Posts: 3


« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2008, 11:35:46 PM »

The reason for opening this thread was to point out that the section "Another identity" in http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Duleep_Singh is incorrect and should be removed.

The writer is confused between two different Duleep Singhs. The person who was  a cricket player was Duleepsinhji, an Indian prince who played in England and after whom the Duleep trophy is named. His *uncle* Ranjitsinhji was an even more reputed cricketer. The Duleep Singh who is the subject of this article and his father Maharaja Ranjit Singh have nothing to do with cricket.

I left a cryptic message in the Wikipedia talk page of the person who added this section in CZ, and Stephen Ewen kindly posted my message in the talk page of Duleep Singh. But more than a year after it was added, and ten months after it was mentioned in the talk page, the section is still there.

Can someone please delete it from the article.

« Last Edit: February 06, 2008, 11:40:45 PM by Tintin » Logged
Stephen Ewen
Guest
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2008, 03:05:22 AM »

Thanks.  I removed the section to the talk page for review.   Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!