Business Workgroup

[River]

Should Entrepreneurs (http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:High_priority_articles_for_pilot#Entrepreneurs) be included in Business Workgroup?

[Zachary Pruckowski]

That seems pretty reasonable.  You may wind up sharing some of those articles with the Computers Workgroup or something, but those look like articles that could go in that workgroup.

[River]

I tagged them as "Business Workgroup (Top)"

[Michael à Campo]

My view is that Entrepreneurs should be a sub-cat of business. However, entrepreneurship the disipline, should be a sub-cat of management, and management should be under social science.

[tkjazzer]

the reason we need workgroup categories is so that people can search recent changes in workgroup articles without having to look at the massive recent changes list.  The problem with wikipedia "related changes" is that if you only list an article specifically with a specific category, a related change on it's broader category that the specific subcategory is in will not detect the change.  See the categories post in the category section of the forum.

[Robert Winmill]

I have made it a practice to include multiple workgroup connections for some of my edits and article starts.  For example and Entry  like "Armadillo Aerospace", an NewSpace aerospace company, is linked to both the "Engineering Workgroup" and the "Business Workgroup".

 

[andrew8]

I suggest entrepreneurship is more a characteristic of investment than business.

Business and investment have overlap, but are quite separate subjects.

So I've recommended 'Investment' as a new Workgroup.