Citizendium Forums
March 20, 2010, 04:54:09 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: POSTING RULES FOR MAIN CZ BOARDS: (1) The CZ Forums are Citizens-only (a "Citizen" is a Citizendium member). Non-Citizens may use only the "Non-member discussion" and "General help" boards, but still must register before posting (it's easy!). Non-Citizen posts elsewhere will be summarily deleted. (2) All must now use their own real names. To edit your displayed name, click on Profile > Account Related Settings. (3) Citizens must now link to their CZ user pages. To edit your signature, click on Profile > Forum Profile Information.
Click here to return to the wiki
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Are we infringing on Wikipedia rights? A message sent to the Constabulary  (Read 3105 times)
Peter Schmitt
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 622


« Reply #30 on: August 18, 2009, 06:06:11 PM »

There seem to be many WP imports that are not credited.
Look at [[natural number]], it has status 4, there are mainly formatting changes made on the original import,
but it is not marked as such.
(In this case I plan to replace the page, but there are probably more, some of them already made "live".)
Logged

Hayford Peirce
Administrator
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 1584



« Reply #31 on: August 18, 2009, 07:46:05 PM »

One problem, Peter, is that when I joined it was not made ABSOLUTELY clear that if there was *any* text left over from WP that had been written by someone else, then the WP checkbox *had* to be checked. The attitude seemed to be, oh, well, you wrote 75% of the article, no need to check the box....
Logged

Matt Innis
Administrator
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 980


« Reply #32 on: August 18, 2009, 08:42:57 PM »

One problem, Peter, is that when I joined it was not made ABSOLUTELY clear that if there was *any* text left over from WP that had been written by someone else, then the WP checkbox *had* to be checked. The attitude seemed to be, oh, well, you wrote 75% of the article, no need to check the box....

My recollection is that Alex Stos had a program that compared all articles looking for phrases that might match the WP article so we could make sure that we weren't using anything from WP.  If there was even one sentence, we checked the box (unless it was common verbiage for that subject).  Initially, most of the authors were the same people that began the articles on WP, but were dissappointed by the changes made at WP, so they brought them over here and returned them to their original state. All they had to do was prove their ID on WP and I would then check the article history on WP to see.  If they were, then we used the WP template to explain and document why we DID NOT have to check the box.

This was all performed during the BIG CLEANUP...  Remember, we started as a total mirror of WP, but then deleted all articles that we did not want and then had to go back and check the box (if necessary).  That process was completed using Alek's script program.  Then others began importing before we realized that if an edit was not made when you clicked the WP checkbox, it would not be saved.  If there are articles left that have not been checked, they were either more recently imported or the box was checked without making an edit.

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:The_Big_Speedydelete

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:The_Big_Cleanup#An_outline_of_your_job_as_.22cleaner.22
« Last Edit: August 18, 2009, 09:10:24 PM by Matt Innis » Logged

Hayford Peirce
Administrator
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 1584



« Reply #33 on: August 18, 2009, 10:30:10 PM »

Ah, I never knew any of that....
Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!