Citizendium Forums
November 22, 2009, 09:51:37 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: POSTING RULES FOR MAIN CZ BOARDS: (1) The CZ Forums are Citizens-only (a "Citizen" is a Citizendium member). Non-Citizens may use only the "Non-member discussion" and "General help" boards, but still must register before posting (it's easy!). Non-Citizen posts elsewhere will be summarily deleted. (2) All must now use their own real names. To edit your displayed name, click on Profile > Account Related Settings. (3) Citizens must now link to their CZ user pages. To edit your signature, click on Profile > Forum Profile Information.
Click here to return to the wiki
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Who are the 'Philosophers' anyway?  (Read 8140 times)
Howard C. Berkowitz
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 1754


« Reply #30 on: March 26, 2009, 03:22:46 PM »

That would mean that one might be (a) a philosopher, (b) an instructor of philosophy, (c) a writer of philosophy, etc.  Is that the distinction that is being drawn?

Can you be a phiolosopher without a formal training.  I would think so. i think its more about what you say and do than your qualifications. Should any person with a phiolosophy degree be considered a phiolosopher? Perhaps, at least in a descriptive way to describe their education.  I guess its all context at the end of the day.

Was Eric Hoffer a philosopher?

For that matter, "Sorry, Mr. Socrates and Bishop Augustine. No doctorate from an approved university. Your ghost cannot be an Editor.  You too, Dr. Aquinas; angelic doctorates are not on our list of recognized terminal degrees."  Grin
Logged

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Howard_C._Berkowitz

Prime Minister, you can't take the bull by the horns if you're grasping the nettle. I mean, if you grasped the nettle with one hand, you could take the bull by one horn with the other hand, but not by both horns because your hand wouldn't be big enough, and if you took a bull by only one horn it would be rather dangerous because...' (Yes Prime Minister II, pp. 221-2)
Aleta Curry
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 1105


« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2009, 02:54:33 PM »

In another thread of this forum ("Where is everyone?"), Aleta Curry referred to:
     "non-serious scholars"?, students, newbiews, people with experience but not professional credentials

She did? Was she trying to be funny?

Welcome aboard, Troy!
Logged

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Aleta_Curry

Lady Astor, to Winston Churchill:  Sir, if you were my husband, I'd put poison in your tea!

Churchill:  Madam, if I were your husband, I'd drink it!
Troy Williamson
New Arrival
*
Posts: 4


« Reply #32 on: March 31, 2009, 08:07:53 AM »

Certainly, in the context of the other conversation, it *could* be that the comment was not "serious"--maybe there was a bit of tongue-in-cheek involved.  In relation to the current discussion, though, it seemed appropos to include the idea--because the question involves the realm of philosophy.

So I certainly wasn't trying to twist words ... it seemed to connect.

And thank you for the welcome! :-)  Good to be here.
Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!