Citizendium Forums
March 20, 2010, 06:01:48 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: POSTING RULES FOR MAIN CZ BOARDS: (1) The CZ Forums are Citizens-only (a "Citizen" is a Citizendium member). Non-Citizens may use only the "Non-member discussion" and "General help" boards, but still must register before posting (it's easy!). Non-Citizen posts elsewhere will be summarily deleted. (2) All must now use their own real names. To edit your displayed name, click on Profile > Account Related Settings. (3) Citizens must now link to their CZ user pages. To edit your signature, click on Profile > Forum Profile Information.
Click here to return to the wiki
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Quality and reputatation re:odinism and related article  (Read 3689 times)
Chris Day
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 1024



« on: October 19, 2007, 03:36:13 PM »

Is anyone else watching the development and now cold storage of these articles? I have to say my main complaint has never to remove the articles themselves.  In fact, i made an extra effort to clean up seance to make that point. My problem is that the quality was awful.

Next, the self promotion is the worst I've seen in citizendium.  There are many geocities personal webpages cited and all are very similar, either run by the same people or cloned. I tend to suspect they are all closely connected to one enterprise.  To think that a citizendium editor would cite these as credible is a bit strange.  We should consider the potential impact on the credibility of citizendium.  I am quite sure one potentially negative thing like this could blow up in the press.  Those articles with the geocities links have been sitting there for months and we can't blame WP for their low quality, they are CZ originals. The WP articles don't cite any of those websites.
Logged

Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Forum Regular
****
Posts: 1174


WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2007, 04:00:48 PM »

Just checked it out, as I had not seen this. Well, there are good reasons why a CZ editor cannot approve his own work. There might also be problems with CZ editors just looking for self-promotion out of CZ. The exact reasons for the cases you cite I do not know, and will not speculate upon. In my own case, though, I have not made a single link in articles to any of my online publications or website: it just looks too tacky. Besides, WP links to my out-of-date website even though the home page tells people [in a band across the top] not to trust WP... Grin
Logged

Kim van der Linde
Forum Communicator
***
Posts: 142


Just me


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2007, 04:21:20 PM »

I agree with Chris, several of the topics warrant an article, that is not the question. There are two articles that I think should be deleted: "The Odin Brotherhood" and the "Other World Society". For those who want to see the content of the Odin Brotherhood, please look here: http://pagan.wikia.com/wiki/Odin_Brotherhood_(Book) and make up your own mind whether this is a serious scholarly work on this topic. The "Other World Society" is a student club of the university he works at.

The other topics can be salvaged.
Logged

Retired
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!